I finally got around to seeing Argo today, four days after it won the Oscar for Best Picture. It’s brilliant, no doubt about it; more in a minute.
I read in the paper that Van Cliburn died yesterday. While
not necessarily a great fan, I was aware of him most of my life; I can’t claim
to specifically remember his winning the Tchaikovsky Competition in in 1958 but
I do remember all the buzz surrounding him. And the piece with which he won,
the Tchaikovsky Piano Concerto No. 1
was the first piece of classical music I ever knew well; I of course have
Cliburn’s recording of it, though the rendition I knew better was by Claudio Arrau
with the Philharmonia Orchestra.
Cliburn played the Rachmaninoff third piano concerto at the
Moscow competition as well. I don’t have that recording, though his death
will likely prompt me to get it. Like the Tchaikovsky, it is a staple of the
classical repertory and a fantastic piece I have long loved.
Great artists and their work live for the ages; these
performances are as exciting today as when they were recorded all those years
ago.
Which brings me back to Ben Affleck and his film Argo. I liked it; I liked it a lot. But
is it best picture material? Will we be watching it and talking about it in
fifty years as we do with Casablanca,
Gone with the Wind and West Side
Story? No way to know yet.
The old-fashioned part of me thinks that Oscar-winning films
should be grand, or important, or sweeping. Is Argo? Grand and sweeping, I think not; important, yes, for sure.
The more liberal, willing-to-try-new stuff side of me disagrees
totally with the grand and sweeping concept. Look at Chariots of Fire, perhaps still my favorite film of all time.
Small, intimate and quiet – and yet it too was a Best Picture.
When Cliburn won in Moscow, New York welcomed him with a
ticker-tape period. Imagine! A ticker-tape parade for a classical musician!
First time ever. Last too.
We need more cultural heroes who play classical music.